<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Has Local Media Used Your News Without Giving Credit?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hyperlocalblogger.com/local-media-used-news-without-giving-credit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hyperlocalblogger.com/local-media-used-news-without-giving-credit/</link>
	<description>Tips and Discussion for Local Bloggers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 21:51:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperlocalblogger.com/local-media-used-news-without-giving-credit/comment-page-1/#comment-4694</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperlocalblogger.com/?p=1163#comment-4694</guid>
		<description>This is a topic our community has discussed at some length in recent months, so you might be interested in reading these old posts and the comments:

http://www.hyperlocalblogger.com/how-do-you-define-hyperlocal/

http://www.hyperlocalblogger.com/defining-hyperlocal/

http://www.hyperlocalblogger.com/lost-remote-tries-defining-hyperlocal/

I agree with TR that it&#039;s an overused word, but as with many other overused words, it seems like the best one we have. My general feeling is that many people use it to signify something that&#039;s &quot;more local&quot; than usual. I put that in quotes because that, too, is a somewhat nebulous term and will mean different things to different people in different places.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a topic our community has discussed at some length in recent months, so you might be interested in reading these old posts and the comments:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hyperlocalblogger.com/how-do-you-define-hyperlocal/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hyperlocalblogger.com/how-do-you-define-hyperlocal/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.hyperlocalblogger.com/defining-hyperlocal/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hyperlocalblogger.com/defining-hyperlocal/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.hyperlocalblogger.com/lost-remote-tries-defining-hyperlocal/" rel="nofollow">http://www.hyperlocalblogger.com/lost-remote-tries-defining-hyperlocal/</a></p>
<p>I agree with TR that it&#8217;s an overused word, but as with many other overused words, it seems like the best one we have. My general feeling is that many people use it to signify something that&#8217;s &#8220;more local&#8221; than usual. I put that in quotes because that, too, is a somewhat nebulous term and will mean different things to different people in different places.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperlocalblogger.com/local-media-used-news-without-giving-credit/comment-page-1/#comment-4692</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 07:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperlocalblogger.com/?p=1163#comment-4692</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t mean that nobody using that word gets paid, it was just a flippant remark. I just meant that the word has no clear delineation to me outside being a buzzword. 

You&#039;re saying that &quot;hyperlocal&quot; is about a city block? Why is that not just &quot;local&quot;? What&#039;s the contrast? Also, news about a specific street? Really?

Don&#039;t be &quot;alarmed&quot;. It&#039;s not that I don&#039;t run into the term 600 times a day. I just never get why it exists. I&#039;m going to start running a series about the notion this week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t mean that nobody using that word gets paid, it was just a flippant remark. I just meant that the word has no clear delineation to me outside being a buzzword. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re saying that &#8220;hyperlocal&#8221; is about a city block? Why is that not just &#8220;local&#8221;? What&#8217;s the contrast? Also, news about a specific street? Really?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be &#8220;alarmed&#8221;. It&#8217;s not that I don&#8217;t run into the term 600 times a day. I just never get why it exists. I&#8217;m going to start running a series about the notion this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TR</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperlocalblogger.com/local-media-used-news-without-giving-credit/comment-page-1/#comment-4691</link>
		<dc:creator>TR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 07:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperlocalblogger.com/?p=1163#comment-4691</guid>
		<description>Tom, if you write and edit a &quot;website about new media journalism,&quot; I&#039;m a little alarmed you don&#039;t know the answer. But at least you&#039;re asking.

&quot;Hyperlocal&quot; is INSANELY misused these days.

It is supposed to mean &quot;so local we&#039;re talking about a neighborhood, maybe even a single city block, something relatively small.&quot; Of course even that can be subjective - the &quot;neighborhood&quot; where we do the news has about 70,000 people, which if it didn&#039;t happen to be attached to the rest of a giant city, could be a nicely sized city all its own. (And once was.)

But now it&#039;s being thrown around in reference to entire MAJOR cities - example, &quot;Big Media Business X is going hyperlocal! They now have a San Diego site, a Seattle site, a Los Angeles site ...&quot; 

That&#039;s not hyperlocal, it&#039;s just plain local. Although as with many misused words (like &quot;blog&quot;) you can avoid the situation by getting as specific as you can get: &quot;Business X is now doing city sites.&quot; &quot;Business X is now doing neighborhood sites.&quot; Etc.

P.S. Hyperlocal people DO get paid. We are in the black, and we&#039;re far from alone. However, my last &quot;local&quot; job, as the #2 manager at a TV station, was in the service of a major media corporation that had declared bankruptcy. Finances here in entrepreneursville = better!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, if you write and edit a &#8220;website about new media journalism,&#8221; I&#8217;m a little alarmed you don&#8217;t know the answer. But at least you&#8217;re asking.</p>
<p>&#8220;Hyperlocal&#8221; is INSANELY misused these days.</p>
<p>It is supposed to mean &#8220;so local we&#8217;re talking about a neighborhood, maybe even a single city block, something relatively small.&#8221; Of course even that can be subjective &#8211; the &#8220;neighborhood&#8221; where we do the news has about 70,000 people, which if it didn&#8217;t happen to be attached to the rest of a giant city, could be a nicely sized city all its own. (And once was.)</p>
<p>But now it&#8217;s being thrown around in reference to entire MAJOR cities &#8211; example, &#8220;Big Media Business X is going hyperlocal! They now have a San Diego site, a Seattle site, a Los Angeles site &#8230;&#8221; </p>
<p>That&#8217;s not hyperlocal, it&#8217;s just plain local. Although as with many misused words (like &#8220;blog&#8221;) you can avoid the situation by getting as specific as you can get: &#8220;Business X is now doing city sites.&#8221; &#8220;Business X is now doing neighborhood sites.&#8221; Etc.</p>
<p>P.S. Hyperlocal people DO get paid. We are in the black, and we&#8217;re far from alone. However, my last &#8220;local&#8221; job, as the #2 manager at a TV station, was in the service of a major media corporation that had declared bankruptcy. Finances here in entrepreneursville = better!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperlocalblogger.com/local-media-used-news-without-giving-credit/comment-page-1/#comment-4686</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 18:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperlocalblogger.com/?p=1163#comment-4686</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s my question for all of you at this blog.

Is there a distinction between &quot;local news&quot; and &quot;hyperlocal news&quot; beyond the &quot;hyperlocal&quot; people not being paid?

I write and edit a website about new media journalism stuff and none of the users of this word seem to be able to delineate why it is a useful term.

Please help me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my question for all of you at this blog.</p>
<p>Is there a distinction between &#8220;local news&#8221; and &#8220;hyperlocal news&#8221; beyond the &#8220;hyperlocal&#8221; people not being paid?</p>
<p>I write and edit a website about new media journalism stuff and none of the users of this word seem to be able to delineate why it is a useful term.</p>
<p>Please help me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Deseo</title>
		<link>http://www.hyperlocalblogger.com/local-media-used-news-without-giving-credit/comment-page-1/#comment-4685</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Deseo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hyperlocalblogger.com/?p=1163#comment-4685</guid>
		<description>What happened to Sullivan sucks, but sadly, it happens to all of us. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thehyperlocalist.com/2010/06/02/the-thought-copier/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Recently on my blog&lt;/a&gt;, I recommended the following:

(1) Use original images to eliminate any doubt of who owns the copyright.

(2) Keep a tight grip on source documents, instead of posting them in a public place.

(3) When someone rips you off, blog the hell out of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happened to Sullivan sucks, but sadly, it happens to all of us. <a href="http://www.thehyperlocalist.com/2010/06/02/the-thought-copier/" rel="nofollow">Recently on my blog</a>, I recommended the following:</p>
<p>(1) Use original images to eliminate any doubt of who owns the copyright.</p>
<p>(2) Keep a tight grip on source documents, instead of posting them in a public place.</p>
<p>(3) When someone rips you off, blog the hell out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

