Stats: Traditional Journalists vs Online Journalists

by Matt on Apr 27, 2010 in Industry, Legal Issues

This is something of a postscript to yesterday’s piece, New Jersey court says blogger is not a journalist … something I remembered reading and finally re-discovered online that adds a bit to the discussion.

Earlier this year, PRWeek and PRNewswire conducted a study of 3,000+ “traditional and non-traditional media” and PR practicioners in the U.S. and Canada. Some of the survey questions focused on this dichotomy (which I hope will go away someday) over who’s a journalist and who’s a blogger. Let me highlight below some of the study’s findings:

There are also some interesting numbers about the use of social networking/media sites as research sources. Bloggers and online journalists do so a lot more frequently than traditional media reporters. Here’s a chart that I made to collect the various survey stats.

sources

As you can see, bloggers and online journalists use blogs and Twitter for research a lot more often than newspaper and magazine reporters do.

So, while I’m all in favor of breaking down the barrier that seems to still exist between whether bloggers are journalists in the so-called traditional sense, this study suggests there are definitely differences in how these groups go about their work.

You might also like:

  1. Citizen Journalists Not Ready to Replace Traditional Media: Pew Report
  2. Newspapers Put Less Than Half of Hyperlocal News Online
  3. Do local bloggers need insurance?
  4. How Does Your Online News Operation Compare?


Comments

One Response to “Stats: Traditional Journalists vs Online Journalists”

  1. Recently on Hyperlocal Blogger on April 28th, 2010 11:13 pm

    [...] Stats: Traditional Journalists vs Online Journalists [...]

Leave a Reply (please use your real name; company names & other keyword-based names will be deleted)